Asking again about draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements

["Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>]

Hi,

When we asked about adopting 
draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-01.txt as a WG document we didn't 
get thorough consensus, and since both Deborah and I are authors on the 
draft, we decided we should play it very safe.

The new revision, draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt, attempts 
to reach closure on the issues raised when we polled the list, and some of 
our own concerns.

So, second time of asking...

Do you think draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt should be 
adopted as a CCAMP working group draft?

Thanks,
Adrian