Re: Asking again about draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements

[Reshad Rahman <rrahman@cisco.com>]

In favour.

Regards,
Reshad.

Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When we asked about adopting 
> draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-01.txt as a WG document we 
> didn't get thorough consensus, and since both Deborah and I are 
> authors on the draft, we decided we should play it very safe.
>
> The new revision, draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt, 
> attempts to reach closure on the issues raised when we polled the 
> list, and some of our own concerns.
>
> So, second time of asking...
>
> Do you think draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt should 
> be adopted as a CCAMP working group draft?
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian