Re: Asking again about draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements

[JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>]

in favor.

JP.

On Oct 13, 2007, at 3:16 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote:

> Hi,
>
> When we asked about adopting draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam- 
> requirements-01.txt as a WG document we didn't get thorough  
> consensus, and since both Deborah and I are authors on the draft,  
> we decided we should play it very safe.
>
> The new revision, draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt,  
> attempts to reach closure on the issues raised when we polled the  
> list, and some of our own concerns.
>
> So, second time of asking...
>
> Do you think draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt  
> should be adopted as a CCAMP working group draft?
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian