Re: Asking again about draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements

[Monique Morrow <mmorrow@cisco.com>]

Also in favor

/monique


On 10/16/07 4:52 AM, "JP Vasseur" <jvasseur@cisco.com> wrote:

> in favor.
> 
> JP.
> 
> On Oct 13, 2007, at 3:16 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> When we asked about adopting draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-
>> requirements-01.txt as a WG document we didn't get thorough
>> consensus, and since both Deborah and I are authors on the draft,
>> we decided we should play it very safe.
>> 
>> The new revision, draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt,
>> attempts to reach closure on the issues raised when we polled the
>> list, and some of our own concerns.
>> 
>> So, second time of asking...
>> 
>> Do you think draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt
>> should be adopted as a CCAMP working group draft?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Adrian
>> 
>> 
>>