[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Asking again about draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements

Hi Adrian.

Yes, I do think it should be adopted.

Julien


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel

Hi,

When we asked about adopting 
draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-01.txt as a WG document we didn't 
get thorough consensus, and since both Deborah and I are authors on the 
draft, we decided we should play it very safe.

The new revision, draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt, attempts 
to reach closure on the issues raised when we polled the list, and some of 
our own concerns.

So, second time of asking...

Do you think draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt should be 
adopted as a CCAMP working group draft?

Thanks,
Adrian