Re: Asking again about draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements

[Dan Li <danli@huawei.com>]

Yes, it should be adopted as a CCAMP WG draft.

Regards,

Dan

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 9:16 PM
Subject: Asking again about draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements


> Hi,
> 
> When we asked about adopting 
> draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-01.txt as a WG document we didn't 
> get thorough consensus, and since both Deborah and I are authors on the 
> draft, we decided we should play it very safe.
> 
> The new revision, draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt, attempts 
> to reach closure on the issues raised when we polled the list, and some of 
> our own concerns.
> 
> So, second time of asking...
> 
> Do you think draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt should be 
> adopted as a CCAMP working group draft?
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> 
> 
> 
> 
>