Re: Asking again about draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements

["Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>]

Looks like a good positive response with no dissention.

We will adopt.

Thanks,
Adrian
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 2:16 PM
Subject: Asking again about draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements


> Hi,
>
> When we asked about adopting 
> draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-01.txt as a WG document we 
> didn't get thorough consensus, and since both Deborah and I are authors on 
> the draft, we decided we should play it very safe.
>
> The new revision, draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt, 
> attempts to reach closure on the issues raised when we polled the list, 
> and some of our own concerns.
>
> So, second time of asking...
>
> Do you think draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt should be 
> adopted as a CCAMP working group draft?
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian