Thomas Narten writes:
Thomas, The WG went down that road and more than a year ago agreed that the problems out weighed the benefits and thus published RFC4864 after more than 2 years of discussion. I do not think that this is the right draft to reopen that discussion. EricAnd I wish others would get their heads out of the sand. The reality is that NAT does have both benefits and drawbacks. Some may think the drawbacks dwarf all benefits, but anyone who has followed this discussion for more than 30 seconds has to see that reasonable people disagree on how to weigh the cost vs. benefits. Can't we just acceptthat and move on?