This independence would be as easily served by changing the v6 prefix and keeping the /64 addresses the same. This kind of renumbering has been built into v6. While keeping the old thinking of NAT kills the end-to-end concept of v6 and hurts many applications that needed work arounds in v4 in order to work. We killed v6NAT once, let's not resurrect it again.On Jul 3, 2008, at 12:54 PM, Ralph Droms wrote:there won't be any motivation for NAT.Provider independence.