Re: new draft on IPv6 CPE router available for review

[Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>]

On 4 jul 2008, at 17:37, David Conrad wrote:

> Because renumbering IPv6 prefixes will not be transparent, there  
> will be a market for NATv6.

This is such nonsense. I wish you would stop spewing it.

NAT gives you stable internal addresses, which may be useful for some  
stuff, but it won't help you much when you need to renumber because  
the problem there is the addresses that external entities see.