RE: Agenda for NETCONF WG session at IETF #71

["Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Muenich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>]

Hi Balazs,

let us focus in the open mic slot (if we have time for it) on topics 
where NETCONF WG can do something.

We think it is interesting to discuss NETCONF-related requirements 
on DML as a preparation for the CANMOD BoF. 
But overall RCDML requirements and DML solution discussion will be 
excluded.

I guess, any decisions on the future DML work will be taken in 
CANMOD BoF.

Cheers, 
Mehmet 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Balazs Lengyel [mailto:balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com] 
> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 2:10 PM
> To: Phil Shafer
> Cc: Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Muenich); netconf@ops.ietf.org; 
> ext Bert Wijnen - IETF; ext Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Subject: Re: Agenda for NETCONF WG session at IETF #71
> 
> My Netconf wish-list)
> 1) Decision on the basis of the DML: YANG, DSDL, XSD, ELUA, ...
> 2) All the DML details
> 
> Please!!! Please !!! Please !!!
> 
> And after that:
> 
> 3) Actions/Custom RPCs
> 4) Freeware Netconf implementations
> 5) Some basic data models (Discovery, Something like the 
> MIB-2 System group, Monitoring)
> 6) Partial Locking
> 
> Balazs
> 
> Phil Shafer wrote:
> > "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Muenich)" writes:
> >> Please let us also know whether you have a concrete topic for
> >> the open mic session.
> > 
> > I posted a list of question for discussion at the last ietf,
> > but nothing really came of it.  Is it worth repeating?
> > 
> >> Another thought is to come up with a list of the five biggest
> >> impediments to NETCONF's complete domination of the configuration
> >> space.  Do we know the answers to questions like:
> >>
> >> - Why aren't/won't device folks shipping netconf implementations?
> >> - Why aren't/won't application writers moving to NETCONF?
> >> - Why isn't NETCONF becoming the answer to configuration problems?
> >> - What's stopping it?
> >> - Where's the chicken?
> >> - What's the egg?
> >> - What's the key to moving forward from here?
> >> - Where should we be concentrating our (precious and few) 
> resources?
> > 
> > The first issue (YANG) is clearly the (YANG) lack of a workable
> > DML, and (YANG) I think we are making (YANG) great progress
> > in that (YANG) area.
> > 
> > But I don't know what the other four top-five issues are.  What
> > stands between us and Complete World Domination (CWD)?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> >  Phil (the (YANG) subtle one ;^)
> > 
> > --
> > to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
> > the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> > archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>
> 
> -- 
> Balazs Lengyel                       Ericsson Hungary Ltd.
> TSP System Manager
> ECN: 831 7320                        Fax: +36 1 4377792
> Tel: +36-1-437-7320     email: Balazs.Lengyel@ericsson.com
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>