"Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Muenich)" writes:
Please let us also know whether you have a concrete topic for
the open mic session.
I posted a list of question for discussion at the last ietf,
but nothing really came of it. Is it worth repeating?
Another thought is to come up with a list of the five biggest
impediments to NETCONF's complete domination of the configuration
space. Do we know the answers to questions like:
- Why aren't/won't device folks shipping netconf implementations?
- Why aren't/won't application writers moving to NETCONF?
- Why isn't NETCONF becoming the answer to configuration problems?
- What's stopping it?
- Where's the chicken?
- What's the egg?
- What's the key to moving forward from here?
- Where should we be concentrating our (precious and few) resources?
The first issue (YANG) is clearly the (YANG) lack of a workable
DML, and (YANG) I think we are making (YANG) great progress
in that (YANG) area.
But I don't know what the other four top-five issues are. What
stands between us and Complete World Domination (CWD)?
Thanks,
Phil (the (YANG) subtle one ;^)
--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>