[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] Comparisons document
- Subject: Re: [idn] Comparisons document
- From: idn <idn@asadal.cs.pusan.ac.kr>
- Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 13:11:03 +0900 (KST)
- cc: idn@ops.ietf.org
- Delivery-date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 20:15:06 -0800
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote:
> One thought is to have each proposal include an appendix with a detailed
> list of how it meets or doesn't meet each requirement from the requirements
> draft.
that sounds great. however, i did not seem to have seen
any article in this regard.
> This would be easier if the requirements document
> either had finer-grained headings or each requirement had its own short
> identifier, such as [Preserve DNS concepts] and [Generate same responses].
good too.
> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --Internet Mail Consortium
김 경석, 부산대 정보 컴퓨터 공학부;
KIM Kyongsok/GIM Gyeongseog, Busan National Univ.
gimgs@hangeul.cs.pusan.ac.kr, http://hangeul.cs.pusan.ac.kr/hangeul/
Ph: +82-(0)51-510-2292, Fax: +82-(0)51-515-2208