[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RFC 5006 status

To: Ole Troan <ot@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: RFC 5006 status
From: Antonio Querubin <tony@lava.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:53:45 -1000 (HST)
Cc: alh-ietf@tndh.net, 'IPv6 Operations' <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <41EC3C33-36EE-48C9-9617-404F0A7847F9@cisco.com>
References: <E47F4C05-D53D-4E04-B15F-07752E9D9A7E@cisco.com> <4B9E96E2.10108@piuha.net> <1315FBDA-12A2-4C16-B66F-CBD4802E6766@cisco.com> <4BA089F9.5010006@piuha.net> <65B6B54D-98AD-4772-B2E0-6E2CA8DE76C0@cisco.com> <419DB14D-BFDC-4118-BB3E-F4D9570D927D@kurtis.pp.se> <A5AB4B97-11BA-4D27-860C-3811D075BFC6@cisco.com> <4BA0EC66.3010403@piuha.net> <308C7176-40DF-4F82-AC2D-A4EAC6E2766B@cisco.com> <AF742F21C1FCEE4DAB7F4842ABDC511C01254C08@XMB-RCD-114.cisco.com> <20100322162757.GV69383@Space.Net> <01a001cac9e8$f703fdb0$e50bf910$@net> <41EC3C33-36EE-48C9-9617-404F0A7847F9@cisco.com>

On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Ole Troan wrote:

if that's your argument, why shouldn't every DHCP option be possible to encode in an ND message?
is DNS _that_ special?

Yes. DNS info is required for any host to operate. Without it SLAAC isreally incomplete.


Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp:  tony@lava.net

References:
- RFC 5006 status
  - From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
- RE: RFC 5006 status
  - From: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
- Re: RFC 5006 status
  - From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
- RE: RFC 5006 status
  - From: "Tony Hain" <alh-ietf@tndh.net>
- Re: RFC 5006 status
  - From: Ole Troan <ot@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: On saving end-to-end transparency (was: Re: I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-09)
Next by Date: Re: On saving end-to-end transparency (was: Re: I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-09)
Previous by thread: Re: RFC 5006 status
Next by thread: RE: RFC 5006 status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread