[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: RFC 5006 status
- To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>, "IPv6 Operations" <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: RE: RFC 5006 status
- From: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:14:47 -0500
- Cc: "Lindqvist Kurt Erik" <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>, "Ralph Droms (rdroms)" <rdroms@cisco.com>, "6man Chairs" <6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "Dave Thaler" <dthaler@windows.microsoft.com>, "Jari Arkko" <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, <jjeong@cs.umn.edu>, <luc.beloeil@orange-ftgroup.com>, <smadanapalli@gmail.com>, "Daniel Park" <soohong.park@samsung.com>
- In-reply-to: <308C7176-40DF-4F82-AC2D-A4EAC6E2766B@cisco.com>
- References: <4B9DFC7D.3070704@piuha.net> <E47F4C05-D53D-4E04-B15F-07752E9D9A7E@cisco.com> <4B9E96E2.10108@piuha.net> <1315FBDA-12A2-4C16-B66F-CBD4802E6766@cisco.com> <4BA089F9.5010006@piuha.net> <65B6B54D-98AD-4772-B2E0-6E2CA8DE76C0@cisco.com> <419DB14D-BFDC-4118-BB3E-F4D9570D927D@kurtis.pp.se> <A5AB4B97-11BA-4D27-860C-3811D075BFC6@cisco.com> <4BA0EC66.3010403@piuha.net> <308C7176-40DF-4F82-AC2D-A4EAC6E2766B@cisco.com>
Here is my input. I do not support moving this document to Standards
Track.
Folks have already asked what if DHCPv6 is also deployed in the IPv6
network and if both ND and DHCPv6 send DNS options who wins? For side
note, please note, routers tend to be deployed with load balancing and
also one may have more than one default router in the network. What if
DNS configuration is fat-fingered on one router but not the other.
Hemant