RE: RFC 5006 status

[Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>]

Hi Fred,
  I think this RFC is ready to be moved to Standards track. The one 
thing I think the document is missing is a domain search list. I would 
like this to be added into the standards track version of this RFC.

Thanks
Suresh
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 8:19 AM
> To: IPv6 Operations
> Cc: Lindqvist Kurt Erik; Ralph Droms; 6man Chairs; Dave 
> Thaler; Jari Arkko; jjeong@cs.umn.edu; 
> luc.beloeil@orange-ftgroup.com; smadanapalli@gmail.com; Daniel Park
> Subject: RFC 5006 status
> 
> This is a structured question for the community.
> 
> Jari Arkko tells us that he is getting requests from various 
> sources to take RFC 5006 to Proposed Standard. It is now experimental.
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5006.txt
> 5006 IPv6 Router Advertisement Option for DNS Configuration. J. Jeong,
>     Ed., S. Park, L. Beloeil, S. Madanapalli. September 2007. (Format:
>     TXT=26136 bytes) (Status: EXPERIMENTAL)
> 
> (1) Please take a look at the document in the next few days; 
> if you have comments on it (eg, you think it should be 
> changed in some way), please comment to v6ops.
> 
> (2) Vendors, please advise on implementations. Are there any? 
> Has interoperability been demonstrated?
> 
> (3) Operators, enterprise and/or service provider, please 
> advise on deployment experience.
> 
> 
> I'm adding a brief discussion to the agenda Monday morning 
> with a view to getting a quick thumbs-up/thumbs-down to 
> advise Jari, who can then take that to 6man later in the week 
> if appropriate.
> 
> 
> 
> BTW, I have had a flurry of email related to the agenda. The 
> current agenda may be found at 
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/10mar/agenda/v6ops.html
>