[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: On saving end-to-end transparency (was: Re: I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-09)

To: Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: On saving end-to-end transparency (was: Re: I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-09)
From: Antonio Querubin <tony@lava.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:44:59 -1000 (HST)
Cc: IPv6 v6ops <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <4BA78BE7.6010005@cisco.com>
References: <4BA78BE7.6010005@cisco.com>

On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Mark Townsley wrote:

Let's err on the side of our ideals here. Publishdraft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security, but do so without default-deny rules onby default. Let's not break end-to-end IPv6 before it even has a chance togrow up.


+1

Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp:  tony@lava.net

References:
- On saving end-to-end transparency (was: Re: I-D.ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-09)
  - From: Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: RE: RFC 5006 status
Next by Date: Re: RFC 5006 status
Previous by thread: Re: On saving end-to-end transparency
Next by thread: On filibusters as a mode of technical discussion
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread