On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Wojciech Dec (wdec) wrote:
My suggestion WRT an accounting restriction is based on a scenario: Accounting system relies on RFC 3162 to report client IP.
NAS decides to send IPv6-Framed-Address rather than RFC 3162 method. Accounting system requires modification to continue to understand the same information.
Yes, I see your point. Don't you think however that this could be handled by a client knob/implementation? I.E. If in an access-accept a server sends the IPv6-Framed-Address, then the NAS client can interpret it to mean that its ok to use this attribute in accounting messages. If
an IPv6-Framed-Address does not come down in an access-accept, then the NAS would use by default "whatever it uses today", unless it has been explicitly configured to send accounting info with using IPv6-Framed-Address.
This would seem to cover your concerns. What do you think?
Yes, sounds reasonable. regards, Peter -- to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>