RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-opsec-filter-caps (Filtering and Rate Limiting Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure) to BCP

["Ross Callon" <rcallon@juniper.net>]

At this point I think that I have a pretty good idea how Barry and Danny
feel about the "informational vs BCP" choice.

Does anyone else have a strong opinion on this issue? 

Do service providers feel that this would effect how they would use the
resulting RFC? I am suspecting that vendors will pay attention or not
pay attention to the OPSEC capabilities drafts based on to what extent
the service providers ask them to. 

Ross

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-opsec@psg.com [mailto:owner-opsec@psg.com] On Behalf Of
Ronald Bonica
Sent: 28 June 2007 11:10
To: Danny McPherson
Cc: gmj@pobox.com; George Jones; bgreene Barry Greene; Chris L. Morrow;
opsec@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-opsec-filter-caps (Filtering and Rate
Limiting Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure) to BCP

Folks,

Please disregard my previous email, instructing the authors to publish
as INFORMATIONAL. I hadn't read Danny's objection yet when I sent that
instruction.

Danny, Barry, please continue this dialog and try to reach some
consensus. In the mean time, I will retreat into my smoke-filled room to
figure out if there is any RFC that provides guidance in case you can't
reach consensus between one another.

                               Ron