[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Comments on draft-zhao-opsec-routing-capabilities-01.txt
> Section 2.1
>
> Max Prefix - needs language added to address what to do when
> max number of routes/prefixes is reached. Doc says "may
> reset the BGP session", which is true, but perhaps it should
> be left admin down. usually when this happens, it continues
> to happen becasue there has been a BGP mis-configuration on
> the other side, and you will continue to have the sessions
> come up and go down unitl this is discovered, which
> introduces instability into the overall routing table.
I section 2.1, the draft mentions "may reject excess routes" as well.
Resetting a session is not the only option.
I think capability document is mainly about what a device should support.
> most tier 1s communicate what this number needs to be, and
> add some sane amount of overhead to it for growth, swings
> etc, but when 60K goes to 120K over and over, bad things happen.
>
> make sense?
>
> would you like me propose some text?
It's OK. I am glad to hear your advice.