Re: sylsog in NETCONF notifications

[Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>]

"Hector Trevino (htrevino)" <htrevino@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>  
> 
> > Rainer Gerhards writes: 
> > WG,
> > 
> > I suggest that the mapping of syslog to netconf notifications 
> > as well as the "syslogTunnel" event type be left out of the 
> > netconf notifications I-D. The reason is that I think the 
> > syslog community should provide a data model for syslog 
> > notifications as well as a mapping. The same should probably 
> > be done for SMTP traps.
> 
> HT: I tend to disagree with this. First, the "syslogTunnel" is just
> a way to indicate that the payload of the NETCONF notification is a
> syslog PDU.

The current draft specifies in B.1 a mapping from the syslog fields to
something called NETCONF event fields.  But these event fields are not
defined anywhere.  Is this part still correct, or are you saying that
the syslog message is tunnelled "as-is"?


/martin

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>