Re: Verbs Again

[Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>]

"Sharon Chisholm" <schishol@nortel.com> wrote:
> hi
> 
> If the working group gets too obsessed with architectural purity at the
> expense of usability to the operators and management applications trying
> to use an implementation of the protocol I think we are more in trouble.
> 
> I've suggested previously the following criteria before deciding whether
> it was appropriate to create a new verb:
> 
> 1. Is it possible to perform this with existing verbs without exploiting
> data model side efforts or being ridiculously complicated?
> 2. Is this operation a management operation and if so does it make sense
> for a management protocol to provide this function natively?
> 
> I think the argument for this verb falls more out of the second
> question.

Are we still talking about <get-syslog-streams> from Phil's draft?
That's the verb that some us thought was better done as a data model
and <get> and <get-config>.


/martin

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>