[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Verbs Again (was RE: draft-shafer-netconf-syslog-00.txt)

Balazs Lengyel wrote:
I think there is a misconception here: Even if we use specialized RPCs for configuring notification handling we still have a hidden data model in them. You still need to define what data can be sent in the RPCs, what they mean and how to specify them. It is just that you do your data modeling in an RPC instead of NV stored data. Mapping between device specific and standard features is the same for data models or "data models inside RPCs". 

I pointed this out a few times already.  I suggested:

1) Move the NV-stored parameters to a data model,
   and leave the session parameters in the RPC.

2) Define the absolute path (from the conceptual <config> & <data> root)
   to the data model root.

3) There is no need for special <get> functions to retrieve state
   info for notification delivery activity and statistics.  They are
   just part of the data model.



Balazs




Andy

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>