[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Guidance needed on well known ports

To: netconf <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Guidance needed on well known ports
From: Balazs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:48:56 +0100
In-reply-to: <441CDD00.60704@alvestrand.no>
References: <441C457D.5080900@cisco.com> <441CDD00.60704@alvestrand.no>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201)

We seem to agree that the choice of port range is not the most important item for Netconf.So anything is OK but decide fast. Maybe the chairman can just decide this or have a votetill today midnight.

Balazs

Harald Alvestrand wrote:

My short term advice to netconf:
Flip a coin. Heads, go for a system port. Tails, go for a well knownport. It's more important to get past the issue than what you decide.
My two cents.

                 Harald

--
Balazs Lengyel                       Ericsson Hungary Ltd.
TSP System Manager
ECN: 831 7320                        Fax: +36 1 4377792
Tel: +36-1-437-7320     email: Balazs.Lengyel@ericsson.com

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

References:
- Guidance needed on well known ports
  - From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports
  - From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>

Prev by Date: Re: Guidance needed on well known ports
Next by Date: Re: Informal Issue summary for Netconf Notification
Previous by thread: Re: Guidance needed on well known ports
Next by thread: Re: Guidance needed on well known ports
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread