[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Guidance needed on well known ports

To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Guidance needed on well known ports
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 23:23:45 +0100
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, IANA <iana@iana.org>, Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>, netconf <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <441C457D.5080900@cisco.com>
Organization: IBM
References: <441C457D.5080900@cisco.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

Regardless of what the community consensus is on:

   1. Are well known ports archaic?


I want to comment that on this:

 If so, can we request that the IANA
      do away with the distinction?


The IETF decides, and the IANA will then be responsible for implementing the decision.

   Brian




--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

References:
- Guidance needed on well known ports
  - From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: RE: use of netconf to configure Unix systems
Next by Date: Re: Guidance needed on well known ports
Previous by thread: Re: Guidance needed on well known ports
Next by thread: RE: Guidance needed on well known ports
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread