RE: Closing the GELS Mailing List

["PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri" <Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel-lucent.be>]

zafar

the main problem remains - to take a base example
in its work plan Adrian mentions

2. "GMPLS control of P2P TE for PBB-TE (802.1Qay)"

[...]
- Label allocation and swapping rules 
[...]

is that not a forwarding component discussion ?

beside the fact that there is an assumption on what
label means and how it is represented in data plane

thanks,
-d.


 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zafar Ali (zali) [mailto:zali@cisco.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 5:54 PM
> To: PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri; Attila Takacs (IJ/ETH); Adrian 
> Farrel; ccamp@ops.ietf.org; gels
> Cc: Ross Callon
> Subject: RE: Closing the GELS Mailing List
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org 
> > [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri
> > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 10:27 AM
> > To: Attila Takacs (IJ/ETH); Adrian Farrel; ccamp@ops.ietf.org; gels
> > Cc: Ross Callon
> > Subject: RE: Closing the GELS Mailing List
> > 
> > attila - yes. but CCAMP is only about "Control" -
> 
> And for interface with Standards Body owning forwarding. Not 
> to mention
> we are all "technical". What else is left? 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Regards... Zafar 
> 
> > -d.
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> > > [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Attila 
> > Takacs (IJ/ETH)
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 4:25 PM
> > > To: Adrian Farrel; ccamp@ops.ietf.org; gels
> > > Cc: Ross Callon
> > > Subject: RE: Closing the GELS Mailing List
> > > 
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > I support closing the gels list. 
> > > 
> > > Since decoupling the discussions into "techno-specific" and GMPLS 
> > > specific part is very difficult, if at all possible, I do 
> > not see how 
> > > to benefit from a separate forum for techno-specific 
> > aspects. IMHO, it 
> > > would be much clearer having a single forum for all related 
> > > discussions anyway.
> > > 
> > > Best regards,
> > > Attila
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> > > > [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> > > > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 11:27 AM
> > > > To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org; gels
> > > > Cc: Ross Callon
> > > > Subject: Closing the GELS Mailing List
> > > > 
> > > > We propose to close the GELS mailing list.
> > > > 
> > > > Loa wrote...
> > > > 
> > > > > I tend to support this, but it begs two questions:
> > > > >
> > > > > - when will the charter update be ack'ed?
> > > > 
> > > > I don't know, and I can't promise that it will be 
> ack'ed. but the 
> > > > Routing ADs appear to support the change.
> > > > 
> > > > > - in the (unlikely) case where we don't get an ack for
> > > > gels work the
> > > > > gels-list won't be needed anyhow, so;  isn't the effect of
> > > > the of your
> > > > > statement below that  the gels-list is dead as of now? 
> > Especially 
> > > > > since the  on thing we are discussing at the moment is
> > > the charter
> > > > > update and this is on the ccamp list??
> > > > 
> > > > Absolutely.
> > > > 
> > > > I'll give you all a last chance to scream.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Adrian
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
>