Re: gels vs. ccamp mailing list

[Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se>]

Adrian,

I tend to support this, but it begs two questions:

- when will the charter update be ack'ed?
- in the (unlikely) case where we don't get an ack for
  gels work the gels-list won't be needed anyhow, so;
  isn't the effect of the of your statement below that
  the gels-list is dead as of now? Especially since the
  on thing we are discussing at the moment is the charter
  update and this is on the ccamp list??

/Loa

Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am thinking to close the GELS list as soon as we have an Ack for our
> charter change.
> 
> Adrian
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Attila Takacs (IJ/ETH)"
> <Attila.Takacs@ericsson.com>
> To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 4:46 PM
> Subject: gels vs. ccamp mailing list
> 
> 
> Hi Deborah and Adrian,
> 
> an administrative question...
> 
> Currently, there are two possibilities to carry on discussion on the
> gels work: the ccamp and the gels mailing lists. Now, that the work will
> officially put on the ccamp charter I think we should reiterate the
> discussion we had about the mailing lists.
> 
> Specifically; should the gels list be used for all the discussion
> (including ccamp drafts on GMPLS extensions) or should all discussion go
> to the ccamp list...and maybe it is time to close the gels list?
> 
> Thanks and best regards,
> Attila
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Loa Andersson

Principal Networking Architect
Acreo AB                           phone:  +46 8 632 77 14
Isafjordsgatan 22                  mobile: +46 739 81 21 64
Kista, Sweden                      email:  loa.andersson@acreo.se
                                           loa@pi.se

This email was Anti Virus checked by Astaro Security Gateway. http://www.astaro.com