RE: Closing the GELS Mailing List

["Zafar Ali \(zali\)" <zali@cisco.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 10:27 AM
> To: Attila Takacs (IJ/ETH); Adrian Farrel; ccamp@ops.ietf.org; gels
> Cc: Ross Callon
> Subject: RE: Closing the GELS Mailing List
> 
> attila - yes. but CCAMP is only about "Control" -
> 

And for interface with Standards Body owning forwarding. Not to mention
we are all "technical". What else is left? 

Thanks

Regards... Zafar 

> -d.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> > [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Attila 
> Takacs (IJ/ETH)
> > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 4:25 PM
> > To: Adrian Farrel; ccamp@ops.ietf.org; gels
> > Cc: Ross Callon
> > Subject: RE: Closing the GELS Mailing List
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I support closing the gels list. 
> > 
> > Since decoupling the discussions into "techno-specific" and GMPLS 
> > specific part is very difficult, if at all possible, I do 
> not see how 
> > to benefit from a separate forum for techno-specific 
> aspects. IMHO, it 
> > would be much clearer having a single forum for all related 
> > discussions anyway.
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Attila
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> > > [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 11:27 AM
> > > To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org; gels
> > > Cc: Ross Callon
> > > Subject: Closing the GELS Mailing List
> > > 
> > > We propose to close the GELS mailing list.
> > > 
> > > Loa wrote...
> > > 
> > > > I tend to support this, but it begs two questions:
> > > >
> > > > - when will the charter update be ack'ed?
> > > 
> > > I don't know, and I can't promise that it will be ack'ed. but the 
> > > Routing ADs appear to support the change.
> > > 
> > > > - in the (unlikely) case where we don't get an ack for
> > > gels work the
> > > > gels-list won't be needed anyhow, so;  isn't the effect of
> > > the of your
> > > > statement below that  the gels-list is dead as of now? 
> Especially 
> > > > since the  on thing we are discussing at the moment is
> > the charter
> > > > update and this is on the ccamp list??
> > > 
> > > Absolutely.
> > > 
> > > I'll give you all a last chance to scream.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Adrian
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
>