RE: Closing the GELS Mailing List

["PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri" <Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel-lucent.be>]

attila - yes. but CCAMP is only about "Control" -

-d.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Attila Takacs (IJ/ETH)
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 4:25 PM
> To: Adrian Farrel; ccamp@ops.ietf.org; gels
> Cc: Ross Callon
> Subject: RE: Closing the GELS Mailing List
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I support closing the gels list. 
> 
> Since decoupling the discussions into "techno-specific" and GMPLS
> specific part is very difficult, if at all possible, I do not 
> see how to
> benefit from a separate forum for techno-specific aspects. IMHO, it
> would be much clearer having a single forum for all related 
> discussions
> anyway.
> 
> Best regards,
> Attila
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org 
> > [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 11:27 AM
> > To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org; gels
> > Cc: Ross Callon
> > Subject: Closing the GELS Mailing List
> > 
> > We propose to close the GELS mailing list.
> > 
> > Loa wrote...
> > 
> > > I tend to support this, but it begs two questions:
> > >
> > > - when will the charter update be ack'ed?
> > 
> > I don't know, and I can't promise that it will be ack'ed. but 
> > the Routing ADs appear to support the change.
> > 
> > > - in the (unlikely) case where we don't get an ack for  
> > gels work the 
> > > gels-list won't be needed anyhow, so;  isn't the effect of 
> > the of your 
> > > statement below that  the gels-list is dead as of now? Especially 
> > > since the  on thing we are discussing at the moment is 
> the charter  
> > > update and this is on the ccamp list??
> > 
> > Absolutely.
> > 
> > I'll give you all a last chance to scream.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Adrian 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
>