From: Andrew G. Malis [mailto:agmalis@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 10:01 AM
To: Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be
Cc: Adrian Farrel; ccamp@ops.ietf.org; gels@rtg.ietf.org; owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Fedyk, Don (BL60:1A00)
Subject: Re: Future of the GELS mailing listDimitri,Since we've agreed that the data plane elements are out of the IETF's charter, this discussion shouldn't occur on an IETF-sponsored list (such as gels@rtg.ietf.org). This should happen either on an IEEE-associated list, or a private list not associated with the IETF.Thanks,Andy
On 7/11/06, Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be <Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be > wrote:adrian & don
> We have agreed we don't define the IEEE data planes in the IETF.
this is agreed before starting GELS (from last year)
the point is that we need a place to discuss data plane elements that are
in scope of the control plane
thanks,
- dimitri.
"Adrian Farrel" < adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Sent by: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
11/07/2006 15:35
Please respond to "Adrian Farrel"
To: "Don Fedyk" < dwfedyk@nortel.com>, Dimitri
PAPADIMITRIOU/BE/ALCATEL@ALCATEL
cc: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>, < gels@rtg.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Future of the GELS mailing list
> We have agreed we don't define the IEEE data planes in
> the IETF. But we will need a venue to discuss the profile
> of the data plane(s). A separate list may be useful.
That was also my thinking, and I would prefer *that* discussion to not
happen on the CCAMP list.
Adrian
_______________________________________________
gels mailing list
gels@rtg.ietf.org
https://rtg.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gels