RE: Future of the GELS mailing list

["MEURIC Julien RD-CORE-LAN" <julien.meuric@orange-ft.com>]

Hi all.

I agree with you Don, especially since I know how large the amount of
GELS messages can be. ;-)  I believe having a dedicated list for those
specific topics can be convenient.

Regards,

Julien


-----Original Message-----
From: gels-bounces@rtg.ietf.org [mailto:gels-bounces@rtg.ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Don Fedyk

Hi Dimitri
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be 
> 
> adrian & don
> 
> > We have agreed we don't define the IEEE data planes in the IETF.
> 
> this is agreed before starting GELS (from last year)

I was just reinforcing the point about what we profile on the data
plane. 

> 
> the point is that we need a place to discuss data plane 
> elements that are in scope of the control plane

But many CCAMP people may not be interested in the details of that in
profile until it is finalized. 
> 
> thanks,
> - dimitri.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
> Sent by: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> 11/07/2006 15:35
> Please respond to "Adrian Farrel"
>  
>         To:     "Don Fedyk" <dwfedyk@nortel.com>, Dimitri 
> PAPADIMITRIOU/BE/ALCATEL@ALCATEL
>         cc:     <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>, <gels@rtg.ietf.org>
>         Subject:        Re: Future of the GELS mailing list
> 
> 
> > We have agreed we don't define the IEEE data planes in the 
> IETF.  But 
> > we will need a venue to discuss the profile of the data 
> plane(s).  A 
> > separate list may be useful.
> 
> That was also my thinking, and I would prefer *that* 
> discussion to not happen on the CCAMP list.
> 
> Adrian 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
gels mailing list
gels@rtg.ietf.org
https://rtg.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gels