RE: Future of the GELS mailing list

["Nurit Sprecher" <nurit.sprecher@SeabridgeNetworks.com>]

I agree.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: gels-bounces@rtg.ietf.org [mailto:gels-bounces@rtg.ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 15:21
To: Ping Pan
Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Adrian Farrel; gels@rtg.ietf.org;
gels-bounces@rtg.ietf.org; dpapadimitriou@psg.com
Subject: RE: Future of the GELS mailing list

ping - this is exactly my point - 

-d.





"Ping Pan" <ppan@hammerheadsystems.com>
Sent by: gels-bounces@rtg.ietf.org
11/07/2006 14:33
 
        To:     Dimitri PAPADIMITRIOU/BE/ALCATEL@ALCATEL, "Adrian
Farrel" 
<adrian@olddog.co.uk>
        cc:     ccamp@ops.ietf.org, gels@rtg.ietf.org, 
dpapadimitriou@psg.com
        Subject:        RE: Future of the GELS mailing list


To make sure further work will be done in GELS, I would think that we
should keep the GELS mailing open until it is within the charter of one
of the WG's.

Yes, let's have the real discussion.

- Ping

-----Original Message-----
From: gels-bounces@rtg.ietf.org [mailto:gels-bounces@rtg.ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 5:17 AM
To: Adrian Farrel
Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org; gels@rtg.ietf.org; owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org;
dpapadimitriou@psg.com
Subject: Re: Future of the GELS mailing list

i can have different interpretations on why people are asking to
shutdown the GELS list (so let's try one that goes beyond mailing list
duplication which is oversimplistic)

shutting down the list means that -de facto- agreement that this effort
is committed and to be chartered as a control plane only work item
@CCAMP with data plane "solutions" sitting outside IETF scope

is my interpretation correct ?

if yes - GELS mailing can be shut down -

if not - it means we don't have agreement to continue this work either
within GELS, CCAMP or whatsover

let's have the real discussion.





Monique Morrow <mmorrow@cisco.com>
Sent by: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
11/07/2006 11:34
 
        To:     Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>,
<ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
        cc:     <gels@rtg.ietf.org>
        Subject:        Re: Future of the GELS mailing list


Agree with shutting down the GELS list.

/m


On 10/7/06 7:35 pm, "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> We reached a sort-of decision in CCAMP today on the future of GELS. 
> You
can
> see this on the chairs slides at
> http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06jul/slides/ccamp-15.ppt#286,8,GELS?
> 
> One question remains.
> Should the GELS mailing list continue or should all discussions move 
> to
the
> CCAMP list?
> 
> I am personally inclined to think that the separate list is a useful
venue
> for discussions that might not be completely dedicated to GMPLS 
> protocol issues. On the other hand, maybe the WG would like all 
> discussions in
the
> same place.
> 
> I would prefer that we stopped copying emails to both lists.
> 
> Opinions?
> Adrian
> 



_______________________________________________
gels mailing list
gels@rtg.ietf.org
https://rtg.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gels

_______________________________________________
gels mailing list
gels@rtg.ietf.org
https://rtg.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gels


_______________________________________________
gels mailing list
gels@rtg.ietf.org
https://rtg.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gels