RE: Future of the GELS mailing list

["Nurit Sprecher" <nurit.sprecher@SeabridgeNetworks.com>]

TO me as well 

-----Original Message-----
From: gels-bounces@rtg.ietf.org [mailto:gels-bounces@rtg.ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Diego Caviglia
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 15:32
To: dwfedyk@nortel.com
Cc: gels; ccamp; <Dimitri.Papadimitriou; dpapadimitriou; Adrian Farrel
<adrian; owner-ccamp
Subject: RE: Future of the GELS mailing list


Sounds good to me.

Diego



"Don Fedyk" <dwfedyk@nortel.com>@rtg.ietf.org on 11/07/2006 15.27.04

Sent by:    gels-bounces@rtg.ietf.org


To:    <Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be>, "Adrian Farrel"
       <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
cc:    ccamp@ops.ietf.org, gels@rtg.ietf.org, owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org,
       dpapadimitriou@psg.com

Subject:    RE: Future of the GELS mailing list

I too would be leery to shut down the list until CCAMP agreed to take on
the work as a charter item. I support the initiative but at the right
time.

We have agreed we don't define the IEEE data planes in the IETF.  But we
will need a venue to discuss the profile of the data plane(s).  A
separate list may be useful.

Don

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of 
> Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 8:17 AM
> To: Adrian Farrel
> Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org; gels@rtg.ietf.org; owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org; 
> dpapadimitriou@psg.com
> Subject: Re: Future of the GELS mailing list
>
> i can have different interpretations on why people are asking to 
> shutdown the GELS list (so let's try one that goes beyond mailing list

> duplication which is oversimplistic)
>
> shutting down the list means that -de facto- agreement that this 
> effort is committed and to be chartered as a control plane only work 
> item @CCAMP with data plane "solutions"
> sitting outside IETF scope
>
> is my interpretation correct ?
>
> if yes - GELS mailing can be shut down -
>
> if not - it means we don't have agreement to continue this work either

> within GELS, CCAMP or whatsover
>
> let's have the real discussion.
>
>
>
>
>
> Monique Morrow <mmorrow@cisco.com>
> Sent by: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> 11/07/2006 11:34
>
>         To:     Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>,
> <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
>         cc:     <gels@rtg.ietf.org>
>         Subject:        Re: Future of the GELS mailing list
>
>
> Agree with shutting down the GELS list.
>
> /m
>
>
> On 10/7/06 7:35 pm, "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We reached a sort-of decision in CCAMP today on the future of GELS.
> > You
> can
> > see this on the chairs slides at
> >
> http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06jul/slides/ccamp-15.ppt#286,8,GELS?
> >
> > One question remains.
> > Should the GELS mailing list continue or should all
> discussions move
> > to
> the
> > CCAMP list?
> >
> > I am personally inclined to think that the separate list is a useful
> venue
> > for discussions that might not be completely dedicated to GMPLS 
> > protocol issues. On the other hand, maybe the WG would like all 
> > discussions in
> the
> > same place.
> >
> > I would prefer that we stopped copying emails to both lists.
> >
> > Opinions?
> > Adrian
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
gels mailing list
gels@rtg.ietf.org
https://rtg.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gels





_______________________________________________
gels mailing list
gels@rtg.ietf.org
https://rtg.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gels