Re: Future of the GELS mailing list

["Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>]

Dimitri,

 

Since we've agreed that the data plane elements are out of the IETF's charter, this discussion shouldn't occur on an IETF-sponsored list (such as gels@rtg.ietf.org).  This should happen either on an IEEE-associated list, or a private list not associated with the IETF.

 

Thanks,

Andy

 

On 7/11/06, Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be <Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be > wrote:

adrian & don

> We have agreed we don't define the IEEE data planes in the IETF.

this is agreed before starting GELS (from last year)

the point is that we need a place to discuss data plane elements that are
in scope of the control plane

thanks,
- dimitri.





"Adrian Farrel" < adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Sent by: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
11/07/2006 15:35
Please respond to "Adrian Farrel"

       To:     "Don Fedyk" < dwfedyk@nortel.com>, Dimitri
PAPADIMITRIOU/BE/ALCATEL@ALCATEL
       cc:     <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>, < gels@rtg.ietf.org>
       Subject:        Re: Future of the GELS mailing list


> We have agreed we don't define the IEEE data planes in
> the IETF.  But we will need a venue to discuss the profile
> of the data plane(s).  A separate list may be useful.

That was also my thinking, and I would prefer *that* discussion to not
happen on the CCAMP list.

Adrian





_______________________________________________
gels mailing list
gels@rtg.ietf.org
https://rtg.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gels