[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue 9.4) Partial locks

To: Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: Issue 9.4) Partial locks
From: William Caban <william@hpcf.upr.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 11:53:25 -0400
Cc: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>, NetConf <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <200312161340.hBGDe0BE055853@idle.juniper.net>
References: <200312161340.hBGDe0BE055853@idle.juniper.net>

On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 09:40, Phil Shafer wrote:
> So can we put this one in the 'closed issues' column?  Locks are
> global and designed to be short-lived; there are no partial locks.
I think there is nothing left to be discussed here. Lets continue with
another issue. 

-W
-- 
William Caban <william@hpcf.upr.edu>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

References:
- Re: Issue 9.4) Partial locks
  - From: Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Issue 5.1) SSH End of message directive
Next by Date: Re: Issue 6.1) SOAP Proxy
Previous by thread: Re: Issue 9.4) Partial locks
Next by thread: Issue 10.1) Allowed protocol operations
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread