[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue 9.4) Partial locks

To: William Caban <william@hpcf.upr.edu>
Subject: Re: Issue 9.4) Partial locks
From: Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 08:40:00 -0500
Cc: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>, NetConf <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 15 Dec 2003 18:40:15 -0400." <1071528015.31652.309.camel@wisepoint.hpcf.upr.edu>

William Caban writes:
>You are right. It is a nice capability but very hard to implement across
>all the mechanisms that might supported on a network device.

So can we put this one in the 'closed issues' column?  Locks are
global and designed to be short-lived; there are no partial locks.

Thanks,
 Phil

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Issue 9.4) Partial locks
  - From: William Caban <william@hpcf.upr.edu>

References:
- Re: Issue 9.4) Partial locks
  - From: William Caban <william@hpcf.upr.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Issue 9.4) Partial locks
Next by Date: Re: Issue 5.1) SSH End of message directive
Previous by thread: Re: Issue 9.4) Partial locks
Next by thread: Re: Issue 9.4) Partial locks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread