[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: xmlconf in a nutshell
At 11:10 AM 4/28/2003, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
>>>>>> Wes Hardaker writes:
>
>Wes> Useful summary Juergen, thanks! I'd be tempted to change the
>Wes> voids to something like 'status' or something appropriate, as all
>Wes> the operations allow a rpc-reply and/or rpc-errors to be
>Wes> returned.
>
>Yes, it probably makes sense to have a return code which indicates
>success or failure and to keep the "out string status" parameter as a
>way to indicate error specifics to the caller.
I'm not sure what this C language syntax interpretation of
the xmlconf protocol operations is for. Is this a conceptual
aid for the mailing list, or something more? IMO, C syntax
that approximates the XML message exchange (but not completely)
without any semantics at all is not entirely useful.
>/js
Andy
--
to unsubscribe send a message to xmlconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/xmlconf/>