[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RFC 5006 status

To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: RFC 5006 status
From: Michael Cardell Widerkrantz <mc@hack.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:51:02 +0100
In-reply-to: <m1NsDlE-0001bZC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> (Philip Homburg's message of "Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:19:32 +0100")
Organization: Temple of the Moby Hack
References: <C7C67F1D.37A5F%alain_durand@cable.comcast.com> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1003180441110.9819@uplift.swm.pp.se> <m1NsBT1-0001bWC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <20100318090413.GE69383@Space.Net> <m1NsCBb-0001blC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <40f323d01003180356m77c9bc9ch3308ee14c47bd495@mail.gmail.com> <m1NsDlE-0001bZC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (berkeley-unix)

Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops@u-1.phicoh.com>, 2010-03-18 12:19 (+0100):

> A quick look at radns suggests that it doesn't send a router
> solicitation messages.

True. Do you think it should? In many operating systems, the
solicitation is sent from a userland program, in many called rtsol or
rtsold.

How rtsol and radns works together depends on the order in which they
are started. If radns is always started before rtsol, the wait for an RA
you hint at should disappear. I confess I haven't looked into this,
really.

Another idea I've had it so merge radns with rtsold. 

Opinions?

-- 
http://hack.org/mc/
Use plain text e-mail, please. OpenPGP welcome, 0xE4C92FA5.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC 5006 status
  - From: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops@u-1.phicoh.com>

References:
- Re: RFC 5006 status
  - From: "Durand, Alain" <alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>
- Re: RFC 5006 status
  - From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
- Re: RFC 5006 status
  - From: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops@u-1.phicoh.com>
- Re: RFC 5006 status
  - From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
- Re: RFC 5006 status
  - From: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops@u-1.phicoh.com>
- Re: RFC 5006 status
  - From: Benoit Boissinot <bboissin@gmail.com>
- Re: RFC 5006 status
  - From: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops@u-1.phicoh.com>

Prev by Date: Re: RFC 5006 status
Next by Date: Re: RFC 5006 status
Previous by thread: Re: RFC 5006 status
Next by thread: Re: RFC 5006 status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread