[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC 5006 status
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Philip Homburg
<pch-v6ops@u-1.phicoh.com> wrote:
> From an implementors point of view, the main thing I find annoying about
> RFC-5006 is that information about DNS servers ends up in the kernel instead
> of in user land where I need it. And I don't want the kernel to store and
> forward all kinds of user land data. Of course, it is always possible to send
> an extra router solicitation ICMP from user land...
>
As for as I know, rdnssd and radns both process the RA information in
userspace. There's no handling of DNS in the kernel.
regards,
Benoit