On 18 mrt 2010, at 04:44, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Durand, Alain wrote:
It might be that the only acceptable answer is we need to defined
BOTH mechanisms for every value to discover.
I favour this approach. With my ISP hat on, I want everything that
has to do with addresses to be handled by DHCPv6 (this is a MUST to
have tracability), the rest can be handled by SLAAC or DHCPv6. I'd
imagine this is totally the opposite of the original intentions of
SLAAC.
In a home scenario, I'd like to leave out the complexity of DHCPv6
if possible, so there I favour RFC5006.
Count me in, although DHCPv6 would be used by the more demanding
users I can see a huge group of end-users who are perfectly ok with
SLAAC on their home network.
MarcoH