[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-nap-02.txt
- To: Walt Lazear <lakematesw@comcast.net>
- Subject: Re: Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-nap-02.txt
- From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 19:50:03 +0000
- Cc: "'Fred Baker'" <fred@cisco.com>, "'Thomas Narten'" <narten@us.ibm.com>, "'Jim Bound'" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>, "'Tony Hain'" <alh-ietf@tndh.net>, "'Brian E Carpenter'" <brc@zurich.ibm.com>, "'EricLKlein'" <ericlklein@softhome.net>, gunter@cisco.com, "'Ralph Droms'" <rdroms@cisco.com>, v6ops@ops.ietf.org, "'Lindqvist Erik Kurt'" <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>, "'Margaret Wasserman'" <margaret@thingmagic.com>
- In-reply-to: <009501c684e2$488021f0$5100a8c0@WaltXP>
- References: <9CBED129-65A0-4986-B4F8-189F60AA490D@cisco.com> <009501c684e2$488021f0$5100a8c0@WaltXP>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
> We're undoing CIDR-like usage. Hierarchical addressing is
> going to be wasteful by nature. I don't know how the IETF
> can influence the RIR allocation policy, but it's scary
> how much history seems to be repeating itself. We're
> at the early end of the cycle, so it may not seem to some
> that we're handing out addresses with both hands, but we are.
>
> Walt Lazear
>
>
RIR policy is derived from those who participate in
the policy development process. The policy development
process is analogous to the IETF of last century, when
what mattered was individual participation... people
weigh in with thier thoughts and opinions. ... Not
companies or organizations per.se. If you don't like
what the RIR's are doing, consider that the polcies are
set by folks active in developing policy...
http://www.arin.net/policy/irpep.html
policies can and have been changed over time.
--bill