RE: Proposed resolution to guidelines document

["Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <jsalowey@cisco.com>]

I think the suggested text is helpful.  

Joe

> Bernard Aboba wrote:
> > [BA] Is this referring to the "opaque data" case?
> 
>   Not really.  There are cases discussed in Appendix B where it's
deemed
> "acceptable" to have non-opaque data in complex types.
> 
>   I think the discussion on the list highlights that we could make it
> clearer that the SHOULD recommendations for using simple data types
are
> not "bats with which to attack people".
> 
>   Adding text to explain the meaning of "SHOULD" in excruciating
detail
> could negate a lot of the worries about the terrible impact of
> recommending simplicity.
> 
>   Alan DeKok.
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>