[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: create-subscription vs. subscribe

To: Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>
Subject: Re: create-subscription vs. subscribe
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 17:55:39 +0100
Cc: netconf@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <45588DAF.20306@andybierman.com>
Mail-followup-to: Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>, netconf@ops.ietf.org
References: <20061113143110.GA17467@boskop.local> <45588DAF.20306@andybierman.com>
Reply-to: j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.10i

On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 07:22:23AM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote:

> I like <subscribe> better, but neither name actually describes
> what this particular verb does.
> 
> We have a "streams" model, not really a "subscribe" model.
> (This is by WG choice.)  In Phil's draft the verb is called 
> <get-syslog-events>.
> IMO, the name <start-notifications> best describes this RPC method.

You subscribe to a stream - sounds quite natural to me.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		 International University Bremen
				 (Jacobs University Bremen as of Spring 2007)
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	 P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany



--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: create-subscription vs. subscribe
  - From: Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>

References:
- create-subscription vs. subscribe
  - From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>
- Re: create-subscription vs. subscribe
  - From: Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>

Prev by Date: Re: create-subscription vs. subscribe
Next by Date: Re: create-subscription vs. subscribe
Previous by thread: Re: create-subscription vs. subscribe
Next by thread: Re: create-subscription vs. subscribe
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread