[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
again about interim
I raised the issue
of a Netconf WG interim meeting in the IESG teleconference yesterday. The
request for an interim immediately after the Montreal meeting was not received
very sympathetically, to say it mildly. It looks like the rules allow indeed for
an interim meeting immediately after the IETF meeting (not before), but this is
perceived rather as a loophole in the rules. The IESG prefers the participants
in an IETF meeting to be able to participate in more activities during the IETF
week, and if an interim is needed it rather be a real interim during the
three-four months between the IETF meetings. Also, the WG will need to take care
of the logistics, find a meeting place, pay for the rooms, etc. The IETF may be
able to find a meeting room on Friday afternoon, but will not pay for Saturday
or Sunday meeting rooms. It's not a definite no, and if you want it and find the
good arguments meeting on Fri-Sat-Sun after the IETF may still be approved, as
it fits in the rules. Yet, you will need to find ways to fund it, as for any
interim.
So, you may want to
consider again options for an interim in May or beginning of June. You also may
ask for two meetings during the Montreal session. Or you may insist for the
interim-stuck-to-Montreal, and may get it.
The more important
thing in my opinion is to continue the good discussions happening on the list
after Dallas, channel them into contributions and try to work towards WG
consensus.
Dan