Re: Interim attendance survey

["Tom Petch" <nwnetworks@dial.pipex.com>]

2) but could become a 3) if the meeting was somewhere convenient like London,
UK.

I think it matters but not as much as getting the current XML straight, which
seems to be taking an inordinate amount of effort, after which I would give
higher priority to the data model.

Tom Petch


----- Original Message -----
From: "Andy Bierman" <ietf@andybierman.com>
To: "Netconf (E-mail)" <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 10:05 PM
Subject: Interim attendance survey


> Hi,
>
>
> I want to do a survey to measure interest in the
> NETCONF Notification work.  Very few people read
> the draft before the meeting, let alone reviewed it,
> despite numerous pleas.
>
> There are 3 choices (option 4: don't care, I already know about):
>
> 1) I do not want the NETCONF notification work to continue
>    and I will not attend the interim meeting.
>
> 2) I want the NETCONF notification work to continue
>    but I will not be able to attend the interim meeting.
>
> 3) I want the NETCONF notification work to continue
>    and I will be able to attend some or all of the 3 day interim meeting.
>
>
> Possible location: Outside North America;
>                    (hopefully w/ non-stop flights from all over)
>                    (3 IETFs in a row in NA already)
>
> Possible dates: 1 - 2 months before the Montreal IETF (May - June)
>
>
> Please send comments to the list.
>
>
> thanks,
> Andy
>
>
>
>
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>