[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Interim attendance survey

Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:

As a contributor I would like the NETCONF notification work to continue
and be completed in time. 
As AD and WG Area Advisor I would like to attend the meeting. However my
schedule is completely booked all May and the first days of June, until
6/5. Yet, my participation is not of condition for the meeting
happening. I prefer European venues to North-American ones. 

Me too. But it's actually a policy (AFAIK) that interim meetings
take into consideration recent (and next) IETF locations and try
to be fair.  I also think we need to be practical, so I think
London would be a good location.  It might be easier with a local
host to setup the logistics (Simon and I are not located near London).

I'm not actually convinced yet this work matters enough to
the WG to be continued.  IMO, this is a "nice-to-have" feature
not a "must-have" (like a replacement for screen scraping CLI w/Expect).

For many WG members, a replacement for syslog is a "don't-need" feature.
Combine "don't-need" with "nice-to-have" and the outcome isn't very
surprising:

   -- very few people reviewed the draft
   -- very little agreement on the problem space
   -- no agreement on the solution

An interim meeting would be a last-ditch attempt to get consensus
started somewhere, before giving up.




Dan


Andy







-----Original Message-----
From: owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andy Bierman 
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 10:05 PM
To: Netconf (E-mail)
Subject: Interim attendance survey

Hi,
I want to do a survey to measure interest in the NETCONF Notification work. Very few people read the draft before the meeting, let alone reviewed it, despite numerous pleas. 
There are 3 choices (option 4: don't care, I already know about):

1) I do not want the NETCONF notification work to continue
   and I will not attend the interim meeting.

2) I want the NETCONF notification work to continue
   but I will not be able to attend the interim meeting.

3) I want the NETCONF notification work to continue
and I will be able to attend some or all of the 3 day interim meeting. 


Possible location: Outside North America;
                   (hopefully w/ non-stop flights from all over)
                   (3 IETFs in a row in NA already)

Possible dates: 1 - 2 months before the Montreal IETF (May - June)


Please send comments to the list.


thanks,
Andy




--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. 
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>



--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>





--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>