[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-05.txt to Proposed Standar d [I06-051127-0011]

To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
Subject: Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-05.txt to Proposed Standar d [I06-051127-0011]
From: Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 21:40:10 -0500
Cc: "'Margaret Wasserman (E-mail)'" <margaret@thingmagic.com>, "Andy Bierman (E-mail)" <ietf@andybierman.com>, "'Netconf (E-mail)'" <netconf@ops.ietf.org>, iana-drafts@icann.org, IANA <iana@iana.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:19:33 +0100." <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155098E18E1@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>

"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" writes:
>But am amswer of "it doies not matter" does not help the IANA
>to make an assignment. We as a WG must choose. If it does not
>matter, then I guess we're saying >1024.

Sorry, that was what I meant.  If it doesn't matter to the
netconf protocol, we shouldn't be eating the relatively
scarce resource.  Especially three of them.

Thanks,
 Phil

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-05.txt to Proposed Standar d [I06-051127-0011]
  - From: Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>

References:
- RE: Evaluation: draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-05.txt to Proposed Standar d [I06-051127-0011]
  - From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>

Prev by Date: transport mappings capability
Next by Date: Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-05.txt to Proposed Standar d [I06-051127-0011]
Previous by thread: Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-05.txt to Proposed Standar d [I06-051127-0011]
Next by thread: Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-05.txt to Proposed Standar d [I06-051127-0011]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread