Re: Polling for new WG IDs

To: "Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS" <dbrungard@att.com>

Subject: Re: Polling for new WG IDs

Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 07:37:47 -0500

Authentication-results: rtp-dkim-1; header.From=jvasseur@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim1001 verified; );

Cc: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>

Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=4003; t=1164976670; x=1165840670; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jvasseur@cisco.com; z=From:=20JP=20Vasseur=20<jvasseur@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20Polling=20for=20new=20WG=20IDs |Sender:=20 |To:=20=22Brungard,=20Deborah=20A,=20ALABS=22=20<dbrungard@att.com>; bh=dKQjn3X1TIBeyvselDhCZM1QdvIAEuMaza4XriQu1w0=; b=rU3QI8Mxc+t8h//Z9VwENSk+VWRoUrKgq4bFsb7HQ1oCpeN5kltWy4PO6SuzD+o1F8ep+xYt oLJ2f9SjJOv1yC0+dLWuP+ifCqIm1Xz9+xCICKFD35MFJrfIzQ7xZ84P;

In-reply-to: <449B2580D802A443A923DABF3EAB82AF0D36F9E9@OCCLUST04EVS1.ugd.att.com>

References: <449B2580D802A443A923DABF3EAB82AF0D36F9E9@OCCLUST04EVS1.ugd.att.com>

On Nov 30, 2006, at 4:23 PM, Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS wrote:

Hi,

As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG drafts:

1. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt

2. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-reqts-02.txt

Yes

3. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-ccamp-inter-domain-recovery-analysis-01.txt

Yes (I'm a co-author).

Thanks.

JP.

Please send yes or no for these IDs.

Reasons and opinions are also welcome.

Thanks,

Deborah and Adrian

References:

Polling for new WG IDs
- From: "Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS" <dbrungard@att.com>