RE: Polling for new WG IDs

["Pandian, Vijay" <Vijay.Pandian@sycamorenet.com>]

1. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt

 

Yes. In my opinion, if we believe in the usefulness of the Control Plane in a transport network, this draft addresses a very important problem that helps migration of legacy networks.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf Of Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 4:23 PM
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Polling for new WG IDs

Hi,

 

As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG drafts:

 

1. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt

 

2. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-reqts-02.txt

 

3. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-ccamp-inter-domain-recovery-analysis-01.txt

 

Please send yes or no for these IDs.

 

Reasons and opinions are also welcome.

 

Thanks,

Deborah and Adrian