[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Polling for new WG IDs

To: "Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS" <dbrungard@att.com>, <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Polling for new WG IDs
From: "Ash, Gerald R \(Jerry\), ALABS" <gash@att.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:25:08 -0600
Cc: "Ash, Gerald R \(Jerry\), ALABS" <gash@att.com>
In-reply-to: <449B2580D802A443A923DABF3EAB82AF0D36F9E9@OCCLUST04EVS1.ugd.att.com>

Yes to all 3.

Thanks,

Jerry

From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 4:23 PM
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Polling for new WG IDs

Hi,

As discussed in San Diego, we need to poll for a couple of new WG drafts:

1. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-caviglia-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-04.txt

2. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kumaki-ccamp-mpls-gmpls-interwork-reqts-02.txt

3. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-ccamp-inter-domain-recovery-analysis-01.txt

Please send yes or no for these IDs.

Reasons and opinions are also welcome.

Thanks,

Deborah and Adrian

References:
- Polling for new WG IDs
  - From: "Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS" <dbrungard@att.com>

Prev by Date: Polling for new WG IDs
Next by Date: RE: Polling for new WG IDs
Previous by thread: Polling for new WG IDs
Next by thread: Re: Polling for new WG IDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread